If the salary was the same, what job would you be doing right now and why?
If Money Were No Measure: The Job I Would Still Choose

If salary were the same for every profession, what job would I be doing today?
It is an intriguing question because money, for better or worse, has become the great architect of our choices. We are often taught to ask, “What does it pay?” before we ask the more consequential question: “What does it mean?” Remove salary from the equation, and suddenly the façade falls away. What remains is inclination—the quiet voice within that tells us where we truly belong.
If I could choose again, I would still choose to be a teacher.
Not merely because I have spent much of my life in classrooms, corridors and school assemblies, but because teaching is one of those rare professions in which the currency is not money but influence. A teacher does not simply impart information; he leaves fingerprints on the future.
I have always found something almost sacred about the moment when a student’s eyes suddenly light up with understanding. A difficult concept, which had seemed like an impenetrable wall a moment ago, becomes a door. The teacher watches it happen and realises that education is not the filling of a vessel but the lighting of a lamp.
Perhaps I would teach Physics again. There is poetry even in Physics—the universe speaking in the austere language of equations, stars obeying laws written long before humanity learnt to read. To teach a young mind about gravity, light, motion or the immensity of space is, in some small way, to introduce that mind to the architecture of creation.
But I would want to teach more than Physics.
I would teach curiosity. I would teach resilience. I would teach a child that failure is not a verdict but a comma in the sentence of life. I would encourage questions rather than merely reward answers. And above all, I would try to convince young people that education should not end with an examination. The real examination begins when there is no question paper, no invigilator and no prescribed answer.
Perhaps, with salary removed from consideration, I might also choose to be a writer—or better still, remain both teacher and writer. The classroom would give me people; writing would give me solitude. Teaching would allow me to shape thoughts in conversation; writing would allow me to preserve them against the erosion of time.
There is an indescribable pleasure in putting a thought into words and watching it acquire a life of its own. A book can travel where its author cannot. It can enter a stranger’s room years after its creation and whisper something that perhaps the reader needed to hear that particular evening. What greater privilege can a writer ask for?
Yet if I had to choose only one profession, I would return to the classroom.
Because teaching offers something that a payslip cannot measure: the possibility of becoming a small but permanent part of someone else’s journey.
Years later, a former student may remember a sentence, a lesson, an admonition, a moment of encouragement—or simply the fact that someone believed in them when they did not believe in themselves. The teacher may have forgotten the incident altogether. The student may carry it for a lifetime.
That is the peculiar magic of education.
So, if tomorrow every profession came with exactly the same salary, I would not chase prestige, power or comfort. I would look for meaning. I would walk back into a classroom, pick up a piece of chalk—or its modern equivalent—and begin again.
For ultimately, the best job is not necessarily the one that makes us rich.
It is the one that makes us feel useful.
And if I could spend another lifetime doing anything at all, I would choose to spend it lighting lamps.





