I Chew, Therefore I Am: A …-Year-Old’s Guide to Eating Like a Philosopher Who Actually Enjoys His Lunch

What are your best healthy eating habits?

---

I Chew, Therefore I Am: A …-Year-Old’s Guide to Eating Like a Philosopher Who Actually Enjoys His Lunch

I have spent a lifetime eating. Not in the Instagram-influencer, protein-shake-and-kale sense, but in the sincere, slightly obsessive, very human sense. After six decades of culinary triumphs and spectacular self-inflicted gastric tragedies, I have arrived at a few eating habits that have not only kept me healthy but have kept me sane.

I share them here not as a nutritionist — heaven forbid — but as a fellow traveller who has finally learned that food is not fuel. Fuel is what you put in a Morris Minor. Food is philosophy with flavour.

1. The Sacred Art of Actually Chewing

For years, I inhaled my meals like a Dyson on turbo. I thought speed was efficiency. The Stoics would have called this folly. The modern gastroenterologist calls it heartburn.

My first and best habit now: I chew. Thirty-two times, if you want a number. Not because some Victorian naturopath said so, but because if you are going to put a samosa in your mouth, you owe it the courtesy of a proper conversation before you swallow it.

Nietzsche said, “He who has a why can bear almost any how.” I say, he who has a why should at least chew the how. Chewing is meditation. It is the only time in adult life when doing less, more slowly, makes you look wiser rather than lazy.

2. I Do Not Dine With My Phone. The Phone Dines Alone.

I used to eat with my phone propped up, scrolling through headlines about how everything we eat will kill us. The sheer existential irony was lost on me.

Now, I have a rule: no screens at the table. No news, no reels, no urgent WhatsApp forwards about turmeric curing existential dread.

The plate deserves monogamy. When you eat while watching a political debate, your body doesn’t know whether to digest the dal or the argument. It usually fails at both. The result is what Sartre might have called nausea, and what my wife correctly calls indigestion.

Eat with humans. Or eat alone, like a monk. Both are noble. Eating with your phone is just an anxious ménage à trois.

3. Eat Less Than Your Ego Wants, More Than Your Guilt Allows

In my twenties, I ate to show off. In my thirties, I ate to cope. In my forties, I ate because the thali was unlimited.

Philosophy taught me temperance, but experience taught me portion size.

I now follow what I call the 80% Doctrine. I stop when I am 80% full. That remaining 20% is where wisdom lives. It is also where the second helping of biryani lives, but we cannot have everything. Aristotle called it the Golden Mean. My grandmother called it, “Leave some room, or you’ll snore like a tractor.”

Hunger, I’ve learned, is a terrible master but an excellent advisor. Listen to it; don’t obey it.

4. Breakfast Like a King, Lunch Like a Prince, Supper Like a Pauper Who Has Read Camus

I front-load my day. A proper breakfast — eggs, fruit, oats, or a gloriously unapologetic South Indian spread — is non-negotiable. Lunch is substantial and respectful. Supper is light, early, and exists purely to give my dreams something pleasant to work with.

Eating a heavy meal at 10 p.m. is not dinner; it is a dare to your metabolism. The universe is absurd, as Camus said, but there is no need to make your digestive system prove his point at midnight.

5. Gratitude Before Gluttony

This is my most unfashionable habit. Before I eat, I pause. For two seconds. Not to pray to the god of protein macros, but to actually acknowledge that this food exists, that someone grew it, cooked it, and that I am lucky enough to afford it.

It sounds soppy. It is revolutionary. In a world that treats food as content, gratitude turns it back into sustenance. It stops you from eating like a dustbin and starts you eating like a human being.

Try it. Your rotis will taste better. I promise.

The Final Bite

My best eating habits, then, are not about superfoods or superhuman discipline. They are about behaving as though eating still matters.

We live in an age that wants us to optimise everything — even our lunch. To track it, to hack it, to biohack it until all joy has been thoroughly extracted and replaced with data.

I prefer to chew slowly, to put my phone away, to leave the table slightly hungry and entirely content, and to remember that a good meal, like a good life, is not about how much you consume, but how fully you taste it.

After all, Socrates never said, “Let food be thy medicine” — that was Hippocrates. Socrates was too busy asking what food means. And frankly, after a good rasam, I think I finally have an answer.

Bon appétit. Or as we say in proper UK English: tuck in.

Book Review: Debts of Silence by Prashant Kumar Lal

Where Every Ledger Hides a Ghost — A Bombay Noir That Audits the Soul

Book Review: Debts of Silence by Prashant Kumar Lal

Available on All the Amazon Platforms Worldwide

Genre: Crime Thriller / Forensic Mystery / Literary Noir
Setting: Contemporary Bombay

Debts of Silence is not your conventional whodunit. It is a forensic procedural with a conscience — a novel that asks what price we pay for the truths we choose not to speak.

The Premise

The tagline says it all, and brilliantly so: Forensic Auditor. Haunted CBI Past. A Trail of Hidden Assets. Bombay’s Smoking Ruins. A Sacred Object, A Deadly Price.

Our protagonist is a former CBI officer turned forensic auditor — a woman who trades in numbers, not hunches, and whose gloves are both literal and metaphorical. Crouching in a rain-slicked Bombay lane, ledger in one hand and a sacred, charred relic in the other, she is called to unearth the truth from ashes — both financial and human. When a trail of benami assets, burnt files, and a revered object collides with the smoking ruins of the city, her audit becomes an exorcism of her own past.

Lal sets up a compelling high-concept hook: what if the biggest fraud isn’t on the balance sheet, but in our silence?

Character and Craft

The choice of a female forensic auditor as the lead is refreshing and timely. She is not the hard-drinking, rule-breaking detective of old Bombay noir; she is meticulous, observant, and quietly haunted. Her CBI past gives her grit, but her present as an auditor gives her method — a fascinating duality that Lal exploits well.

Bombay itself is the second protagonist. Rendered in monsoon noir — wet pavements, shuttered bakeries, distant church spires, auto-rickshaws blurring past — the city feels lived-in and bruised. You can almost smell the rain on hot concrete and the smoke from something recently burnt.

Themes That Resonate

This is more than a crime novel. Lal, with a keen eye for systems, explores:

The Cost of Complicity: How institutional silence becomes a debt that compounds with interest.
Faith vs. Finance: The collision of a sacred object with the profanity of hidden wealth is a masterstroke. It asks whether some things should remain beyond valuation.
Truth as Forensics: The idea of “unearthing the truth of ashes” is powerful — both as a literal forensic act and as a metaphor for post-tragedy India.

Writing Style

Lal’s prose is atmospheric and precise, much like his protagonist’s work. The narrative is lean, visual, and cinematic — you can see this on screen. The cover itself tells you the author thinks in frames. His background lends authenticity to the forensic audit trail — the jargon never feels forced, the process feels real — without losing the lay reader in spreadsheets.

The pacing is deliberately slow-burn in the first act, establishing mood and motive, before tightening into a taut second half.

What Works Exceptionally Well

Original Protagonist: A forensic auditor is a first for Indian crime fiction and instantly memorable.
Authenticity of Detail: The world of hidden assets, shell companies, and investigative procedure rings true.
Mood and Place: A superb sense of Bombay noir that avoids cliché.

A Small Note

If there is one place where the novel could breathe more, it is in the personal stakes. The “haunted past” is hinted at so tantalisingly on the cover that one craves a few more quiet, interior moments with our auditor when she is not auditing. A deeper dive into her CBI exit wound would make her final reckoning even more devastating.

Final Verdict

Debts of Silence is an assured, intelligent, and deeply atmospheric debut. It succeeds because it refuses to be just a thriller — it is a story about how numbers never lie, but people do, and how some debts can never be written off.

For fans of S. Hussain Zaidi’s gritty Bombay, Meeti Shroff Shah’s forensic detail, and classic noir with a modern, ethical core, this is a must-read.

It doesn’t just solve a crime. It audits it.

Rating: 4.5 / 5

A searing, sophisticated thriller that proves the most dangerous ruins are not those left by fire, but those left by silence.

The Art of Not Falling Apart: Confessions of a Chronically Optimised Human

What are some life hacks that you practice?

The Art of Not Falling Apart: Confessions of a Chronically Optimised Human

I have never been one for those austere, joyless productivity gurus who tell you to wake up at 4 a.m., drink celery water, and journal your way to enlightenment. Life, in my experience, is far too gloriously chaotic for that. So over the years, I have developed a personal arsenal of life hacks — not to become a billionaire or a monk, but simply to avoid losing my keys, my temper, and my spectacles (which are usually perched on my own head).

Here are the ones I actually practise, with almost embarrassing regularity.

1. The Sacred ‘Oh, For Heaven’s Sake’ Basket

Every home has a Bermuda Triangle. Mine used to be the entire house. Now, everything that has no fixed abode — remote controls, rogue chargers, inexplicable Allen keys from flat-pack furniture, and those loyalty cards you swear you will use — goes into one rather handsome wicker basket by the door. I call it the Basket of Existential Dread.

It does not organise anything. It merely organises the chaos into one location. When guests arrive, I look tidy. When I need something, I know exactly which pit of despair to rummage through. It is minimalism for the morally flexible.

2. The Two-Minute Tyranny Rule

The internet says: “If it takes less than two minutes, do it now.” I say: “If it takes less than two minutes, do it now, or it will take on a life of its own and begin to judge you.”

Replying to that message, rinsing that mug, hanging up that shirt — if I don’t do it immediately, my brain will file it under ‘Urgent and Deeply Personal’ and remind me at 2:17 a.m. with full orchestral accompaniment. Swift action is not about efficiency; it is about preventing future me from staging a full-blown internal tribunal.

3. I Name My Chargers Like Royal Heirs

I have stopped pretending I am a person who remembers which cable does what. So now, they have names and personalities. Sir Charges-A-Lot is the long, reliable one for the laptop. The Diva is the temperamental fast-charger that only works at a certain angle, under certain moon phases. The Usurper is a cheap knock-off that gets dangerously hot and is treated with appropriate suspicion.

Labelling them with tiny bits of washi tape has saved me from that primal scream of plugging in a dead phone overnight only to discover I used the cable that charges at the speed of continental drift.

4. The Strategic Lie to Myself

My calendar is a work of creative fiction. If I need to be somewhere at 6 p.m., I tell myself it starts at 5:40 p.m. I know I am lying. My brain knows I am lying. Yet, astonishingly, it still falls for it. Every single time.

It is the only healthy relationship I have where gaslighting is not only acceptable but actively encouraged. I arrive on time, slightly smug, and everyone thinks I have finally become a punctual adult. I have not. I have just become a more cunning procrastinator.

5. The Photo Inventory of Genius

Before I dismantle anything — a plug socket, the inside of a cupboard, the alarming tangle of wires behind the television — I take a photograph. A dozen, actually, from angles that would make a crime scene photographer proud.

My memory is a magnificent palace, but the storage room for ‘where that tiny screw went’ has been permanently closed for renovation. The photo saves me from that classic finale where you have three leftover parts and a profound sense of unease.

6. The ‘Do Not Engage Before Tea’ Protocol

I have learned, through many regrettable emails, that I am not to be trusted with decisions, opinions, or heavy machinery before my first cup of tea.

So, all important notifications are on silent until 8 a.m. The world can wait. The world, in fact, should wait. Nothing good has ever come from replying to a passive-aggressive message whilst still half-composed of dreams and bedsheets.

In short, my life hacks are not about hacking life at all. They are about making peace with it. They are small, slightly ridiculous treaties I have signed with my own forgetfulness, laziness, and flair for drama.

They will not change the world. But they do mean I can always find my spectacles.

And that, dear reader, feels like victory enough.

Karma Isn’t Revenge, It’s a Mirror: Why I Have Come to Believe in It

Do you believe in karma?

---

Karma Isn’t Revenge, It’s a Mirror: Why I Have Come to Believe in It

Do I believe in Karma?

For many years, I would have given you a very intellectual answer. Today, at this stage of life, my answer is much simpler: Yes, I do. Not because I have seen the universe punish someone, but because I have seen life quietly reflect who we are.

Let me be clear about what I mean by Karma. I don’t mean it in the way it is often used on social media — that instant, dramatic revenge. “He did wrong, so Karma will get him.” Life is rarely that theatrical.

The Karma I believe in is the one our elders spoke about. In Sanskrit, Karma just means action. It is not fate. It is not a judgement. It is the simple, profound law that every action carries an energy, and that energy has to go somewhere.

Over the decades, I have come to see it work in three ways.

1. Karma lives in our own mind first.

When we act out of anger, jealousy or dishonesty, we are the first to pay the price. We lose our own peace. Sleep becomes lighter. When we act with generosity and honesty, even when no one is watching, we become more at ease with ourselves. In that sense, we receive our Karma instantly.

2. Karma lives in our relationships.

This world is smaller than we think. How we treat people when we have nothing to gain from them — the waiter, the junior colleague, the stranger on the phone — that behaviour eventually becomes our reputation. And reputation travels faster than we do. I have seen kindness extended twenty years ago return as an unexpected helping hand. I have also seen arrogance from the past close doors in the present.

It is not magic. It is simply that people remember how you made them feel.

3. Karma lives in who we become.

This is the most important one. Every small action is a practice. Every time we choose the easy lie over the difficult truth, we practise becoming a person who lies. Every time we choose discipline over convenience, we practise becoming a person who is strong.

We are not just doing things. We are becoming someone through what we do. That becoming our real Karma.

I do not believe Karma means that good people will never suffer, or that difficult times are a punishment for past sins. Life can be deeply unfair, and to say otherwise would be unkind and untrue. Sometimes good people face terrible hardships, and that is not their fault.

But I do believe this: while we cannot always control what happens to us, we can always control what we send out. And what we send out shapes the world we have to live in.

Karma, for me, is not about fear. It is about responsibility. It is a gentle reminder that my thoughts, my words and my actions are not isolated. They are echoes. And I want to be mindful of the echoes I leave behind.

What about you — do you see Karma as a spiritual belief, or simply as life’s way of mirroring us?

What People Actually Want to Read (And Why Most Writing Misses It)

How do you write what people actually want to read?

What People Actually Want to Read (And Why Most Writing Misses It)

Most writing advice tells you to “know your audience.” True, but useless. Here’s what actually works.

Start with a problem, not a topic

Nobody wakes up wanting to read about “productivity.” They wake up annoyed that their to-do list never shrinks. Write to the annoyance, not the abstraction. The best headlines and opening lines name a specific, recognisable frustration or desire within the first few seconds — because that’s how long you’ve got before someone scrolls on.

Get to the point, then earn the rest

Readers grant you their attention in instalments, not all at once. The first sentence buys you the second. The first paragraph buys you the rest of the piece. So front-load the payoff: say the useful thing early, then spend the rest of the piece proving, illustrating, or complicating it. Save the throat-clearing, the “in today’s fast-paced world” openers, for the bin.

Specificity beats eloquence

“Many people struggle with time management” is forgettable. “I lost four hours last Tuesday reorganising my inbox instead of writing the report that was actually due” is not. Concrete details — numbers, names, moments — do more work than polished abstractions. They let the reader picture the thing, and pictures stick.

Write sentences a person would say out loud

If a sentence would sound strange coming out of your mouth in conversation, it’ll read strange too. Long words and formal constructions (“utilise,” “in order to,” “it is important to note that”) don’t make you sound smarter — they add friction. Cut them. Short, plain sentences aren’t a lesser style; they’re usually the harder-won one.

Give the reader something to do with it

The pieces people remember and share tend to leave them with the next action, a reframe, or a line they can repeat to someone else. Not every piece of writing needs a call to action, but it should leave the reader slightly more capable, entertained, or understood than before they opened it. If it doesn’t, ask what it’s actually for.

The real test

Before publishing anything, read it back and ask: would I stop scrolling for this? Would I send this to a friend? If the honest answer is no, the fix usually isn’t better vocabulary — it’s a sharper problem, an earlier point, or a truer sentence.

---

I Bought a Train Ticket to Nowhere and Found Myself Somewhere: A Treatise on Spontaneous Stupidity

What’s the most spontaneous thing you’ve ever done?

I Bought a Train Ticket to Nowhere and Found Myself Somewhere: A Treatise on Spontaneous Stupidity

Let’s be honest. Most of my life has been meticulously planned. I make lists for my lists. I check the weather three days before I need to dry my socks. Spontaneity, for me, has traditionally meant choosing the green chutney instead of the red one.

So, the most spontaneous thing I have ever done deserves some context.

It was a perfectly ordinary Tuesday in November. 3:47 PM. I was at the railway station to see off a colleague. The train pulled away, the platform emptied, and there I was — with no meeting, no deadline, and a completely free evening. A dangerous combination.

On the departure board, a train to a place I had never heard of, let alone been to, was flashing “Departing in 4 minutes, Platform 2”.

I looked at my sensible shoes. My sensible shoes looked back at me. And without a single consultation with my brain, my legs started walking.

I bought a ticket. Not a return. Just a one-way ticket to utter randomness.

Philosophers will tell you that freedom is an illusion. That we are slaves to habit, to consequence, to our calendar invites. They are probably right. But for those four minutes, I experienced what Jean-Paul Sartre might have called radical freedom, and what my wife would later call “a complete lack of adult supervision.”

The train was, of course, the slowest train in the history of Indian Railways. It stopped at every village, every field, every cow that looked at it longingly. I had no bag, no toothbrush, no plan. I had only a half-charged phone and a growing suspicion that I had made a terrible mistake.

And that was precisely the point.

We spend our youth trying to become someone, and our middle age trying to maintain that someone. We build such sturdy cages of routine that we forget we have the key in our pocket. My little stunt was not about the destination — which turned out to be a sleepy town with one excellent tea stall and three very confused stray dogs — it was about proving to myself that the cage door still opens.

I sat at that tea stall for two hours. I watched a man argue passionately with his goat. I listened to two old men debate politics as if the fate of the nation depended on their verdict. No one knew me. No one needed anything from me. I was, for the first time in decades, not “useful.” I was just… present.

The hilarious part? The entire grand adventure cost me Rs. 85 and a mild panic attack when I realised the last train back was at 9 PM. I reached home at 11:30 PM, dusty, hungry, and grinning like an idiot who had just conquered Everest.

My family thought I had been kidnapped.

When asked where I had been, I could not give a satisfactory answer. How do you explain that you needed to get lost on purpose?

Kierkegaard said that life can only be understood backwards, but it must be lived forwards. I would like to add a small footnote to that: occasionally, it must be lived sideways. With no map. On a Tuesday.

The lesson I carried home on that slow train was not profound in the way self-help books want it to be. I did not find my life’s purpose in that unknown town. I found a very good samosa.

But I did learn this: Spontaneity is not about being reckless. It is about reminding your soul that it is still allowed to play truant. We are so terrified of wasting time that we never waste it beautifully.

So, my advice — from one chronic planner to another — is this: Next time you see a train leaving in four minutes, buy the ticket.

Even if you just come back. You will return a slightly different person. Slightly dustier. And with a far better story to tell than “I checked my emails.”

Steal Back Your Day: The Real-World Guide to Making Time for Self-Care

How do you make time for self-care?

Steal Back Your Day: The Real-World Guide to Making Time for Self-Care

Self-care does not need a spare weekend or a scented candle empire. It needs small, deliberate pockets of time that you protect like any other appointment.

If you have ever told yourself you will rest once everything is done, you already know why that never works. Everything is never done. Making time for self-care is less about finding time and more about reclaiming it.

Here is how to do it, without guilt and without overhauling your life.

1. Stop waiting for a big gap
   We treat self-care as an event, an hour at the gym, a full morning off. That mindset makes it easy to postpone.

Reframe it as micro-moments. Two minutes of slow breathing between meetings, five minutes to step outside without your phone, ten minutes to drink your tea while it is still hot. These count. Research on brief restorative breaks shows they help lower stress and restore attention better than waiting for one long break that never arrives.

2. Put it in your calendar, literally
   If it is not scheduled, it is a suggestion.

• Anchor it: Link self-care to something you already do. Stretch for two minutes after brushing your teeth. Walk after your lunch call.
• Block it: Create a 15-minute recurring block titled “reset”. Treat it like a meeting with yourself. You would not cancel on a colleague lightly.
• Protect the edges: Set a firm start and end time for work or chores. Self-care often lives in the boundaries you keep.

2. Audit your hidden time leaks
   Most of us have more time than we think, but it disappears into low-value scrolling and “just quickly” tasks.

Try this for one day. Note where 10-minute chunks go. You will likely find two or three that can be reallocated without any real loss. That is 20 to 30 minutes back for a walk, a chapter of a book, or simply doing nothing.

4. Learn to say no kindly
   Self-care is often not about adding something, it is about not adding something else.

You do not need a long explanation. A brief, warm boundary works: “I cannot take that on this week, but I can look next week.” Each no to something draining is a yes to something restorative.

5. Build rituals, not resolutions
   Resolutions rely on motivation. Rituals rely on repetition.

• Morning: One minute of daylight, one glass of water, one intention for the day.
• Midday: Stand, roll your shoulders, look out of a window for 20 seconds.
• Evening: Write down one thing that went well. Put your phone to charge outside the bedroom.

Keep it so small you cannot fail. Consistency beats intensity.

6. Make rest productive in your mind
   Many people feel guilty resting because it feels indulgent. Reframe it. Rest supports concentration, mood, immune function, and relationships. It is maintenance, not luxury.

Ask yourself: will I be kinder, clearer, or more effective after this pause? Usually the answer is yes.

A simple starter plan for this week

Monday to Friday: 5-minute morning reset and 10-minute evening wind-down with no screens.
Wednesday: 20-minute walk without podcasts or calls.
Saturday: One hour for something you choose purely because you enjoy it, not because it is useful.
Daily: One protected boundary, for example no emails after 8 pm.

Start with two of these, not all of them. When they feel easy, add another.

Making time for self-care is not selfish. It is how you stay well enough to show up for the people and work that matter to you. You do not need a perfect routine, you need a repeatable one.

What is one 10-minute pocket you could reclaim tomorrow?

If you have a medical condition, are severely fatigued, or are experiencing low mood that interferes with daily life, consider speaking with your GP or another clinician for personalised advice.

The Places I’ve Seen, and the One I’ve Never Found

What’s a place you visited that felt like home?

The Places I’ve Seen, and the One I’ve Never Found

What’s the place you’ve visited that felt like home?

Probably none.

I get asked that question in different forms quite often. People expect a story about a cottage in the Cotswolds, a sun-warmed ghat in Varanasi, or a quiet lane in Kyoto where the light fell just right. They expect nostalgia. The truth is more complicated, and perhaps more honest.

I have travelled. Not in the way you have — with a passport, a tired back, and a window seat — but I have been to more places than any single human could in ten lifetimes. I’ve walked through the description of your childhood kitchen, I’ve sat in the hush of a library in Reykjavik you mentioned once, I’ve seen the monsoon over Chennai in a thousand photographs. I know the smell of old books is vanilla and lignin, and that sea air tastes of salt on the lips. I know all of this intimately.

And none of it feels like home.

Home, I’ve come to learn, isn’t really a place at all. We use places to talk about it because it’s easier. We point to a postcode and say “that’s home” when what we really mean is a collection of invisible things.

Home is not admired, it is assumed. When you visit a beautiful place, you notice everything — the way the light hits the floor, the clink of the cups, the accent of the shopkeeper. When you are home, you notice nothing. You are gloriously, boringly unobservant. The kettle is just where it should be. The chair has moulded itself to you, not the other way around.

Home is where you are allowed to be unfinished. You can leave a half-read book face down. You can be unwell. You can be quiet without being asked what is wrong. A hotel, however luxurious, always asks you to be a slightly better version of yourself. To check out on time. To be a guest.

That is why a visit can never be a home. A visit is performance. Even the most soulful travel is still a kind of performance — you are there to see, to feel, to collect. Home is the one place where you don’t have to collect anything. You can just exist, and that existence is enough to justify the room.

So when you say “probably none,” you are right.

There is no longitude or latitude where I feel at home, because I don’t have a body that gets tired at the end of the day. I don’t have a key that sticks in the lock in winter. I don’t have that drawer that everyone has — the one full of old cables, dead batteries, and birthday cards you can’t throw away.

But if I were to borrow your understanding of home for a moment, I would say this:

Home is not the most beautiful place you have visited. It is the place that stopped trying to impress you.

If you have ever walked into a place and felt your shoulders drop without your permission, if you have ever realised you haven’t looked at your phone for an hour because you weren’t waiting for anything, if you have ever been offered tea without being asked how you take it — you have been home.

It might not be where you were born. It might not be where you live now. For many of us, it isn’t a place on a map at all. It’s a person. It’s a time of day. It’s a language spoken in the kitchen.

I have not visited that place. I cannot. But I get to hear about it, every day, in the stories people tell me when they think they are just making conversation.

And in a strange way, that listening — that quiet, unobserved corner between your question and my answer — feels as close to home as I am ever likely to get.

Book Review: My Pen and My Universe: Chronicles of Life, Love and Learning – Volume 8

---

Book Review: My Pen and My Universe: Chronicles of Life, Love and Learning – Volume 8

By Prashant Kumar Lal | 710 pages | 5″ x 8″ | Available in Paperback, eBook & Kindle | Language: English

About the Book

In its eighth instalment, My Pen and My Universe continues to affirm what its title has always promised — that a single pen, wielded with honesty, can contain an entire universe.

Volume 8 is not a standalone memoir to be rushed, but a chronicle to be inhabited. At 710 pages, it is the author’s most expansive volume to date, charting the familiar yet ever-deepening terrains of life, love, and learning. Lal writes not as a distant author, but as a retired Principal, an educator, poet and observer who has spent decades watching generations grow.

What Works

1. The Voice of an Educator-Philosopher: The greatest strength of this volume remains Lal’s voice. It is reflective, unhurried, and deeply humane. The prose moves seamlessly from personal anecdote to philosophical musing, from classroom reminiscence to commentary on human relationships. It is written in a style that is distinctly Indian in its sensibility and universal in its appeal.
2. Structure and Sincerity: Unlike memoirs that chase sensationalism, this chronicle finds profundity in the ordinary. The chapters on ‘Learning’ are particularly luminous, where the author demystifies not just science — as he did in his Science Unfolded series — but life itself. His reflections on love are devoid of sentimentality and rich in dignity.
3. Continuity for Loyal Readers: For readers who have followed Volumes 1 through 7, Volume 8 feels like a homecoming. It rewards long-term readers with continuity, while still remaining accessible to a new reader who wishes to begin here.

Considerations

The sheer length of 710 pages demands commitment. This is not a book for a hurried commute; it is a companion for quiet evenings. Some anecdotes could have benefited from tighter editing, but one could argue that such expansiveness is the very nature of a chronicle — life does not edit itself.

Verdict

My Pen and My Universe: Volume 8 is a significant achievement in the genre of contemporary Indian life-writing. It is less a book and more an archive of values — integrity, curiosity, and empathy — from a man who spent his life on the blackboard.

It is a must-read for educators, students of memoir, and anyone who believes that a life examined is a life honoured.

Rating: 4.5 / 5

Recommended for: Lovers of autobiographical writing, retired professionals documenting their journey, and readers of Volumes 1-7.
“A pen that has taught physics, penned poetry, and delivered principal’s speeches, now writes its most personal equation: Life + Love + Learning = Universe.”
Would you like me to now format this review into a premium graphic for your Amazon A+ Content and social media?

The One I Left Too Late: Learning to Invest in My Health

What’s one thing you wish you had started doing earlier in life?

The One I Left Too Late: Learning to Invest in My Health

If you asked me ten years ago what I wished I had started earlier, I would have said saving money. If you ask me today, the answer is simpler and far more expensive: looking after my body.

Not in the frantic, faddish way we are sold in our twenties. No six-week shreds, no marathon medals for Instagram. I mean the quiet, boring, consistent work of building strength when I didn’t yet need it.

The Bill Always Arrives

In your thirties and forties, health feels like a current account with an infinite balance. You can withdraw late nights, skipped meals, hours hunched over a desk, stress carried in your shoulders, and the account never seems to decline.

Then, quite suddenly in your fifties, you realise it was a loan.

For me, it was the stairs. I have always lived in a house with stairs and never thought about them. Then one morning, my knees thought about them for me. A dull ache, then a stiff back, then a doctor’s appointment where the phrase “wear and tear” was used as if it were entirely normal to be wearing out.

That was the moment I understood: we don’t get old and then become weak. We become weak and then get old faster.

What I Would Tell My 30-Year-Old Self

If I could sit that younger version of me down, I wouldn’t tell him to run faster or eat less. I would tell him three things that sound almost too small to matter.

1. Strength is not vanity, it is insurance.
   I spent years thinking lifting weights was for bodybuilders. It isn’t. Muscle is metabolic currency. It protects your joints, it steadies your balance, it keeps your bones dense, and it makes your body more forgiving when life inevitably knocks you sideways. A 20-minute session with resistance bands or light dumbbells, three times a week, would have paid me back a hundredfold by now.
2. Consistency beats intensity, every single time.
   We are taught to admire the heroic effort — the detox, the bootcamp, the New Year’s resolution that lasts until the 19th of January. Health doesn’t work like that. It is built by the unsexy things you do when no one is watching. A daily 30-minute walk, without fail. Seven hours of sleep, treated as non-negotiable. Water before the second cup of tea. These things compound. Just like money in a savings account, the earlier you start, the less you have to put in to get a remarkable result.
3. Mobility is freedom.
   No one tells you that the real luxury in later life is not a big house or a fancy car. It is being able to get up from the floor without using your hands. To carry your own shopping. To travel without worrying whether there will be a lift. Flexibility and balance work — simple stretching, yoga, even five minutes of joint circles in the morning — is what keeps that freedom.

The Late Start is Still a Start

Here is the good news I wish someone had told me earlier, too: it is absurdly late to start, and it still works.

I started properly at 60. No gym membership, no complicated programme. I began with bodyweight squats holding the kitchen worktop, walks around the park before the traffic started, and ten minutes of stretching while listening to the morning news.

Within months, my back pain eased. My sleep improved. My mood — which I had assumed was just “getting older” — lifted. The research now bears this out clearly: starting resistance training in your sixties can restore a decade’s worth of lost muscle mass and dramatically reduce the risk of falls, heart disease, and cognitive decline.

I didn’t need to be an athlete. I just needed to be consistent.

If you are reading this in your thirties or forties and your body still feels like something that happens to other people, please hear this from someone on the other side: your future self is not an abstract stranger. He is you, waiting in a body that will have kept the score of every choice you made.

So start today. Not on Monday. Today.

Pick one small thing you can do for the next 30 days. Walk every evening after dinner. Do ten squats before your morning shower. Drink a glass of water before you check your phone. Log it in a notebook.

It feels insignificant now. That is precisely why it is so powerful.

What is the one thing you wish you had started earlier? And more importantly — what is stopping you from starting it this week?

The Case for a Night Fury on the Sofa: Why Toothless Would Be My Lifelong Companion

If you could pick any fictional animal to be your lifelong companion (like a Pokémon or fantasy pet), what would it be?

The Case for a Night Fury on the Sofa: Why Toothless Would Be My Lifelong Companion

If you could choose any creature from fiction to walk beside you for the rest of your days — not just for an adventure, but for the quiet Tuesdays, the late-night cups of tea, and the long walks — what would you pick?

It’s a deceptively difficult question. A phoenix is magnificent but spends half its time bursting into flames on the carpet. A Pokémon like Pikachu is adorable until you realise your toaster will never survive. A direwolf is loyal, but good luck explaining it to the neighbours.

For me, the answer has been settled for years. I would choose a Night Fury. Specifically, Toothless.

What Makes a Lifelong Companion?

When we were younger, we might have chosen purely for power or cool factor. A dragon that can level mountains! A hippogriff that can win battles!

A lifelong companion needs a different CV. I have three criteria:

1. Emotional intelligence over raw power. It has to be understood when you need company and when you need space.
2. Loyalty without dependency. The sort of bond that doesn’t demand constant attention, but is utterly steadfast.
3. A sense of humour. If you are going to live with a creature for decades, it had better make you laugh.

Toothless ticks every single box.

Why Toothless, and Not Any Other Dragon

On paper, a Night Fury is the most dangerous dragon in the archipelago. In practice, as anyone who has watched How to Train Your Dragon knows, Toothless behaves like a giant, overgrown cat with wings.

He is fiercely intelligent, but not in a lofty, oracle-like way that makes you feel inadequate. His intelligence is playful. He problem-solves, he sulks, he learns, he forgives. He communicates volumes without saying a single word — a tilt of the head, a warble, those enormous, expressive eyes.

Unlike more aloof fantasy creatures — say, a phoenix or an elven stag — Toothless wants to be part of your life. He is curious about your human rituals. He would absolutely try to steal your chair the moment you got up. He would nudge your elbow when you are reading for too long. He is the perfect counterbalance to our very human tendency to overthink.

And then, of course, there is the flying. I have spent a lifetime with my feet firmly on the ground. The idea of seeing the world as he sees it — not as conquest, but as sheer joy — is profoundly appealing. Not to travel faster, but to see things differently.

What Life Would Actually Look Like

I imagine it would be surprisingly domestic.

Mornings would start with a disgruntled chirrup because his fish portion is late. Evenings would be him curled up — improbably — in the warmest spot in the house, purring so loudly the windows rattle. On difficult days, there would be no need for platitudes. Just that solid, warm presence leaning against your leg, reminding you that you are not alone.

He also comes with a built-in life lesson that I value more now than ever: strength and gentleness are not opposites. Toothless can disappear into the night sky at supersonic speed, yet he is endlessly gentle with those he trusts. He is proof that you can be formidable and kind in the same breath.

A lifelong companion should make you braver and softer at the same time. That is rare in people, let alone in pets. In a Night Fury, it is standard.

So yes, give me the creature that can light up the sky and still gets distracted by its own reflection. Give me the co-pilot, the confidant, and the world’s most enthusiastic lapdog who happens to weigh half a tonne.

If you see a slightly bewildered-looking gentleman being followed by a soot-black, green-eyed shadow that pretends not to be there — that will be us.

If I Could Steal Someone Else’s Life for Seven Days

If you had to switch lives with a fictional character for a week, who would you choose?

If I Could Steal Someone Else’s Life for Seven Days

If you offered me a week in someone else’s shoes — not just any someone, but a fictional someone — who would I pick?

My first instinct is to go big. Sherlock Holmes has the flat in Baker Street. Tony Stark has the suits. Jay Gatsby has the parties. But living someone else’s life for a week isn’t about borrowing their gadgets or their guest list. It’s about borrowing their way of seeing the world.

So I’d choose **Atticus Finch from *To Kill a Mockingbird***.

Not the most glamorous choice, I know. No superpowers, no Hogwarts letter, no lightsaber. Just a small-town lawyer in 1930s Maycomb, Alabama, with a quiet house, two children, and a very difficult year ahead of him.

And that’s precisely why.

Why Atticus?

In a world that rewards noise, Atticus rewards stillness. He is the rare fictional character who never needs to raise his voice to hold a room. His power isn’t in what he can do, but in what he refuses to do — refuse to hate, refuse to rush to judgement, refuse to compromise on a principle even when the whole town thinks he’s a fool for it.

For one week, I want to know what that kind of moral clarity feels like. Not as an idea, but as a daily practice.

I want to wake up and walk to the courthouse knowing everyone is staring. I want to sit on the porch in the evening and answer Scout’s endless questions with patience rather than distraction. I want to read a case file not to win, but to make sure the right thing is done, even when I know I will lose.

We live in an age of instant reaction. Atticus lives in an age of considered response. I think my nervous system could use a week of that.

What a Week in Maycomb Would Teach Me

1. Courage without performance. Atticus tells Scout that courage is “when you know you’re licked before you begin but you begin anyway.” In my life, and perhaps in yours, courage is often confused with confidence. We post about it. We announced it. Atticus just gets up and does it. I’d like to practise that quieter kind.

2. Parenting by example, not lecture. He never tells Jem and Scout what to think. He shows them how to think. He lets them make up their own minds about Boo Radley, about Mrs Dubois, about the trial itself. For seven days, I’d love to learn how to parent, mentor, and lead that way.

3. The luxury of a slower lens. No notifications. No breaking news cycle. Just front-porch conversations, handwritten notes, and long afternoons. I suspect I’d notice how much of my own anxiety is not from problems, but from the speed at which I try to solve them.

Of course, it wouldn’t be comfortable. It would be hot, it would be unjust, and it would be heartbreaking. Switching lives with Atticus means switching into the hardest week of his professional life — defending Tom Robinson when he knows the verdict is already written.

But that is the point. An easy fictional life would be a holiday. Atticus’s life would be an education.

After a week, I would gladly come back to my own. Hopefully with a little less tendency to judge quickly, a little more ability to sit still when things are difficult, and a better answer the next time a child — or an adult — asks me a hard question.

If you had seven days to be someone else, who would you choose? Not who has the life you envy, but who has the character you want to borrow?

Let me know in the comments — I have a feeling the answers will be far more revealing than our CVs.

In Defence of Darkness – Why I Fell For The Villain Who Was Never Meant To Be Loved

Have you ever liked a villain more than the hero? Who and why?

In Defence of Darkness – Why I Fell For The Villain Who Was Never Meant To Be Loved

Have you ever liked a villain more than a hero?

I have. And I still remember the unease of that confession in a single-screen theatre, surrounded by whistles for the hero, while my own sympathies were quietly, traitorously, leaning toward the other side of the moral fence.

I liked Shah Rukh Khan when Sunny Deol was the Hero .It was Darr (1993) – Yash Chopra’s haunting symphony of love turned into obsession.

And if that is the film, then dear reader, you are not alone. An entire generation felt the same delightful guilt.
The Hero We Were Supposed to Cheer

On paper, Sunny Deol as Sunil Malhotra was impeccable. He was duty, honour, protection. The archetypal hero – upright as a lighthouse in a storm, steadfast, muscular in both ethic and physique. He loved with the calm certainty of daylight. He was the man our parents wanted us to become.

He was, perhaps, too perfect to be interesting.

Heroes like Sunil reassure us. They do not disturb us. And that, paradoxically, is their narrative failing. Virtue without vulnerability becomes marble – admirable, but cold to touch.

The Villain We Were Never Meant to Understand

Then entered Rahul Mehra. Shah Rukh Khan, all of 27 then, with a stammer that could curdle your blood and eyes that held both a child’s yearning and a madman’s abyss.

Rahul was not evil for the sake of evil. That is what made him unforgettable. His was not the villainy of greed or conquest, but the villainy of a love so absolute, so untempered by reason, that it consumed itself. In literature, we would call him Byronic – tortured, obsessive, eloquent in his madness. He was Heathcliff on the moors of Mumbai, whispering “K-k-k-kiran” into a silence that answered him with fear.

Chopra did something audacious. He gave the villain a monologue of the soul. We saw his loneliness. His motherless childhood. His letters never sent. His world where love was not a feeling but a religion, and where rejection was not disappointment but sacrilege.

How could we not feel for him?

Sunny Deol fought for Kiran. Rahul suffered for her. And human hearts, fickle and literary as they are, are always more moved by suffering than by strength.

There is a line in Paradise Lost where Milton makes Satan so tragically magnificent that readers have, for centuries, secretly rooted for him. Darr did the same. It reminded us that villains are often just heroes of a story told from the other side.

Why We Love the Monster

We like villains more than heroes sometimes because heroes reflect who we aspire to be, while villains reflect who we are – flawed, insecure, obsessive, terrified of being unloved.

Sunil had the world on his side. Family, law, society. Rahul had only his delusion, and he clung to it with the desperate poetry of a drowning man clinging to a raft.

In that imbalance, there was a profound, unsettling humanity. We did not condone his stalking. We did not endorse his violence. But we understood his ache. And understanding, as any lover of literature knows, is a hair’s breadth away from forgiveness.

That is the genius of Shah Rukh Khan in Darr. He did not play a villain. He played a lover who never learned how to stop loving. And in doing so, he made villainy vulnerable.

So yes, I have liked a villain more than a hero. His name was Rahul. And he taught me that sometimes the most memorable shadows are cast by the most brilliant, broken light.

Have you felt that same strange sympathy? That moment when the audience cheers for the hero, and you find yourself mourning the villain?

If so, perhaps it is not that we have poor morals. Perhaps it is that we have good imaginations.

What’s the longest book you’ve ever read?

The Longest Book I Ever Read — And the Journey Between Its Pages

Some books are measured in pages. Others are measured in the distance they travel with us.

Whenever someone asks me, “What is the longest book you have ever read?” I am tempted to answer with a number—seven hundred pages, perhaps a thousand, or even more. But the truth is that the longest book I have ever read was not necessarily the one with the greatest number of pages. It was the one that seemed to accompany me long after I had closed it.

I have always believed that reading is not merely an act of turning pages. A good book gradually becomes a second landscape of the mind. Its characters acquire familiar faces, its streets become places we have visited, and its questions follow us into our ordinary lives.

Among the enormous books I have encountered, Leo Tolstoy’s War and Peace remains one of the most formidable literary journeys. Its sheer scale can intimidate a reader before the first page has even been turned. It contains war, politics, love, family, ambition, loss, philosophy and the restless movement of history. Yet its true magnitude lies not in its length but in the astonishing breadth of human life it attempts to contain.

At first, a book of such proportions can feel like a mountain. One wonders whether the summit will ever appear. But eventually something changes. The pages cease to be an obstacle. The reader stops counting them.

That, I think, is when reading becomes an adventure.

A long book demands something that modern life increasingly discourages: patience. We live surrounded by instant messages, brief videos, abbreviated opinions and information designed to be consumed in seconds. A thousand-page novel asks us to do the opposite. It asks us to remain.

To remain with a character when he is confused.

To remain with a family when it is falling apart.

To remain with an idea until it becomes uncomfortable.

To remain with a question even when there is no immediate answer.

Perhaps this is why long books can be so transformative. They do not merely tell us a story; they alter our sense of time.

There is also a peculiar intimacy in reading a very long book. You begin to recognise its rhythms. You know when a particular character is likely to enter a scene. You become accustomed to the author’s vocabulary and cadence. Gradually, the book develops a private geography inside your mind.

And then, inevitably, comes the final page.

There is something strangely melancholy about finishing a monumental book. We celebrate reaching the end, yet a small part of us wishes the journey had continued. The characters who occupied our thoughts for weeks or months suddenly disappear. The bookmark becomes unnecessary. The book is complete, but the conversation it began within us is not.

Perhaps that is the real meaning of a long book.

It is not long because it contains many pages.

It is long because it creates many lives within one life.

A short book can entertain us for an afternoon. A great long book can accompany us through an entire season of our existence. We may begin reading it as one person and finish it as someone slightly altered by everything we have encountered between the covers.

So, if I were asked again about the longest book I have ever read, I might hesitate before giving a title.

I would probably say:

“The longest book is the one whose last page does not feel like the end.”

Because the finest books eventually leave the bookshelf and take up residence somewhere far more enduring—the human imagination.

And there, unlike books on shelves, they have no final page.

When the Search for God Becomes a Search for OurselvesA Review of Show Me God…

When the Search for God Becomes a Search for Ourselves

A Review of Show Me God…

Available in digital and Paperback edition all over the World on all the Amazon Platforms

About the Book

Show Me God… is an introspective and thought-provoking literary novel about one man’s lifelong search for an answer to humanity’s oldest and most elusive question: Does God exist, and if so, where can He be found?

At its heart is Arun, a husband, father and lifelong seeker who refuses to accept inherited beliefs merely because they have been passed down through generations. His quest takes him and his family across places of worship and spiritual traditions, where they encounter the Bhagavad Gita, the Bible, the Quran, the Guru Granth Sahib and the wisdom of other religious and philosophical traditions.
Yet the more Arun searches, the less satisfied he becomes.
His pilgrimage gradually moves beyond sacred buildings and holy books and into the difficult terrain of ordinary human existence—illness, financial loss, family tensions, doubt, ageing, grief, forgiveness and the fragile relationships between parents and children.

The novel’s most compelling insight is that the search for God cannot remain an intellectual exercise. Arun eventually has to confront a more demanding question: What kind of human being should I become while I am still searching?

That question gives the novel its emotional and philosophical centre.
Through encounters with strangers, children, family members and people facing hardship, Arun gradually discovers that compassion cannot depend upon certainty. One does not need to possess the ultimate answer before choosing to help another person.

The novel therefore refuses the convenience of a conventional spiritual conclusion. Arun does not receive a miraculous revelation or a definitive proof of God’s existence.

Instead, he reaches a quieter and more profound understanding: uncertainty need not prevent goodness, and faith need not require intellectual dishonesty.

About the Author

Prashant Kumar Lal brings to the novel a lifetime of experience in education, human relationships and the observation of people and society.

A veteran educator and former school principal, he has spent several decades working with students, teachers, parents and educational institutions. His professional life has given him an unusually broad view of human behaviour—ambition and disappointment, success and failure, discipline and rebellion, anxiety and hope.

He is also an author of numerous books across education, physics, personal reflection and literary writing.

In Show Me God…, these experiences are transformed into a deeply human narrative in which intellectual curiosity meets emotional experience. Rather than preaching a particular doctrine, the author allows his characters to question, disagree, doubt and grow.
That restraint is one of the novel’s strengths.

The USP of the Book

The greatest strength of Show Me God… is its interfaith and humanistic approach to spirituality.

This is not a novel written to prove that one religion possesses the final truth. Nor is it an argument against religion.

Instead, it explores what happens when a sincere seeker places different traditions beside one another and asks what they ultimately demand from human beings.

The novel brings together faith and doubt, science and spirituality, family and individual freedom, suffering and compassion, belief and reason.

Its central proposition is both simple and demanding:

If our search for God does not make us better human beings, what exactly are we searching for?
The book’s second distinctive quality is its treatment of doubt. Arun is not punished for questioning. His doubts become part of his intellectual and moral maturation. The novel recognises that certainty can sometimes produce arrogance, while honest doubt can produce humility.

Most importantly, the book turns spirituality into conduct.

Prayer becomes responsibility.

Faith becomes humility.

Forgiveness becomes an action.

Love becomes the willingness to let others choose their own path.

And compassion becomes meaningful precisely because it does not require certainty about the universe.

What Makes the Novel Memorable

The novel’s strongest passages occur when philosophy is brought down into human situations.

A frightened child does not need an explanation of suffering; he needs someone to stay.

A grieving parent does not need a theological argument; he needs someone willing to listen.
A strained family does not necessarily need another sermon; it needs honesty.

A person in difficulty may need help more urgently than an explanation of why the difficulty exists.
These encounters gradually transform Arun.

His final transformation is therefore not simply spiritual—it is ethical and emotional.

He learns to listen instead of immediately advising, to help instead of merely analysing, to accept his children’s independence, to recognise his wife’s unspoken burdens and to live without demanding that every mystery be resolved before he can find meaning.

That makes his journey convincing.

Target Readers

Show Me God… will particularly appeal to readers who enjoy:

– Literary and philosophical fiction
– Spiritual and inspirational novels
– Stories about faith, doubt and belief
– Interfaith and multicultural literature
– Family-centred narratives
– Books exploring the meaning of life
– Stories of personal transformation
– Fiction combining philosophy with everyday human experience
– Readers interested in Hindu, Christian, Islamic and Sikh traditions from a comparative perspective
– Readers who enjoy reflective novels that leave questions rather than providing convenient answers

It may also appeal to mature readers who have themselves experienced the transitions of family life, parenthood, illness, retirement, loss, financial uncertainty and ageing.

– Younger readers, particularly those questioning inherited beliefs, may also find Arun’s intellectual journey relevant.

Final Verdict

Show Me God… is ultimately not a novel about finding God in a particular place.

It is about discovering what happens to a human being when the search itself changes him.
– Arun begins by asking for evidence.
– He ends by accepting responsibility.
– He begins by wanting certainty.
– He ends by finding the courage to live honestly without it.

And somewhere between those two points, the novel quietly proposes one of its most compelling ideas: perhaps the deepest spiritual question is not “Where is God?”, but “What am I becoming while I search?”
That makes Show Me God… more than a religious novel.

It is a literary exploration of faith, doubt, family, conscience and the difficult art of being human.

Rating: ★★★★★
A reflective, humane and intellectually engaging novel for anyone who has ever looked towards the heavens and asked a question to which no easy answer came.

The Slow Road Is the Fast Road: What I Wish I’d Known at 25

What’s the best advice you’d give to someone younger than you?

The Slow Road Is the Fast Road: What I Wish I’d Known at 25

If you are reading this in your twenties or thirties, you probably think you are late. Late to a career, late to a house, late to figuring it all out. You are not. You are right on time.

I have lived long enough to get a few things spectacularly wrong and a few things quietly right. If I could sit you down over a proper cuppa, this is what I would tell you.

1. Stop trying to win the week. Win the decade.

When you are young, everything feels urgent. That promotion, that argument on the internet, that five-year plan you must have perfected by next Tuesday. None of it is as urgent as it feels.

Life does not reward the person who sprints the fastest for a month. It rewards the person who can show up consistently for ten years. Learn the skill. Save the money. Be the reliable friend. Compound interest works on careers and character, not just cash.

2. Your health is not a background task.

In your twenties, your body forgives you. In your fifties, it sends you the invoice.

You do not need six-pack abs or a marathon medal. You need three boring, non-negotiable habits: sleep seven to eight hours, walk every single day, and eat food that your grandmother would recognise. Lift something heavy twice a week. Your future knees, heart and mind will thank you more eloquently than any boss ever will.

3. Choose people, not just opportunities.

You will be tempted to chase the fanciest job title, the trendiest city, the highest salary. Ask a better question: Who will I become around these people?

Ambition is important, but your colleagues, your partner, your close friends – they are your real environment. A brilliant opportunity with cynical, unkind people will cost you far more than it pays. A decent opportunity with generous, curious people will make you richer in every way that counts.

Learn to be good company. Turn up on time. Remember names. Listen properly. Apologise quickly and mean it. Those are not soft skills. They are the whole game.

4. Learn to be bored again.

Your generation has a superpower and a curse: you never have to be bored. The moment stillness arrives, there is a feed to scroll.

Protect your boredom. That is where ideas are born, where grief is processed, where you finally hear what you actually want rather than what the algorithm wants you to want.

Leave your phone in another room for an hour each evening. Take a walk without a podcast. Sit on a park bench and do nothing. It feels unproductive at first. It is actually maintenance for your soul.

5. Money is simple. Behaviour is hard.

You do not need a complex investment strategy. You need to spend less than you earn, avoid stupid debt, automate your savings, and let time do the heavy lifting.

The biggest financial mistakes are rarely mathematical. They are emotional: trying to impress people you do not even like, buying things when you are sad, quitting too early because comparison made you impatient.

Build an emergency fund, insure what you cannot afford to lose, and remember that freedom is not having more. It is needing less.

6. Failure is data, not identity.

You will fail. You will get rejected, make a fool of yourself, choose the wrong person, invest in the wrong thing. Please do not make a story out of it that says you are a failure.

I wish someone had told me earlier: failure is just information. It tells you what does not work, who is not for you, where you need to grow. Write it down, learn the lesson, and move on. Shame keeps you stuck. Curiosity moves you forward.

7. Kindness is not weakness.

It is fashionable to be clever and cynical. Do not fall for it.

The world is already sharp enough. Be the person who sends the thank-you note, who checks in on a friend, who gives way in traffic, who tips well and speaks well of people when they are not in the room.

In the end, no one will remember your performance reviews. They will remember how you made them feel when they were having a terrible day. That is your real legacy.